EADS Home
  New Products
  Products
  Products by Model No.
  Systems/Applications
  News/Events
  Careers
  All Press Releases
 


 

VXIbus

Enhanced Pulse Measurement and Generation
Using VXI Based Instruments

Abstract
This paper describes the problems associated with large rack-and-stack ATE systems in relation to pulse timing performance. An overview of the limited applications that can be met with more traditional measurement approaches will be reviewed together with how merging instrumentation technologies, such as VXI can be applied to meet both today's and future needs.

Introduction
Automatic Test Equipment (ATE) of one form or another has been around for over twenty years. Early systems utilized BCD programmable instruments and had to make do with a great deal of human intervention. The establishment of the IEEE-STD-488 brought about a revolution in ATE design. System integrators no longer needed to be instrumentation specialists. This could now be left to the dedicated instrumentation companies. Off-the-shelf instruments were now available with a standard communications control interface. The systems integrator could at last get down to the real problems of writing software and configuring the system.


General Hardware Interfacing
Unit Under Test (UUT) and signal interfacing became one of the biggest headaches for the systems integrator. UUT interfacing is the means of connecting between the UUT and the ATE system. Signal interfacing is the routing of signals between instruments (both measurement and stimulus). The interfacing to the computer controller was resolved with the advent of IEEE-STD-488.


Hardware Instrument Interfacing
What are the problems of instrument to instrument interfacing? The most serious is that of timing between instruments, we can call this "the orchestration of the instrument suite".

Consider a large ATE for testing avionics such as a radar system. A typical configuration is shown in Figure 1. Notice that the pulse and delay generators are as close to each other as possible, and close the UUT interface so that in theory synchronization pulses have minimum lengths to travel and minimum differential lengths. On closer examination, the critical pulse generation and measurement instrument cable lengths present significant problems. Figure 2 shows how the cable is routed between instruments in a test rack. As can be seen, it is not just a simple matter of short interconnection between the two units. Cable retractors and rack to rack wiring add many feet of cable.


Unwanted Timing Delays
Why are the lengths of these cables so important? To synchronize pulse generators and arm counter/timers, coax cables are used to connect them to each other. Unfortunately, it takes a finite time for a pulse to travel down a cable.

In free space an electromagnetic (E.M.)wave travels at:

    3 x 1010 cm/s (approximate)
    (There are 2.54 cm in 1 inch)
    3/2.54 x 1010 inches/s
    = 1.18 x 1010 inches/s

    So how long to travel 12 inches?
    12/1.18 x 1010
    = 1.01 x 109 seconds
    1 nanosecond

In free space an electromagnetic wave will travel 12 inches in 1 nanosecond.

Coaxial cable, however, slows down the E.M. wave, nominally by a factor of 0.66. (Velocity factor for solid dielectric coax cable.) Now, instead of taking 1ns to travel 12 inches, it will take approximately 1.5ns.

The time delay then, when connecting two instruments, even mounted close together, say with 7 feet of cable, can add up to 10 nanoseconds. This is unacceptable in modern radar and EW environments. In medium to long range radars, where the radar pulse is between 1 and 10 microseconds long, and ranges are in excess of several hundred feet, these instrument to instrument delays have never been considered a problem.

But today, busy airfield ground movement radars need to resolve to feet and automatic aircraft carrier landing systems need control to tens of feet.

Figure 2. Test Rack Instrument to Instrument Cabling


Application
Figure 3a shows the ideal case for a radar simulator. Pulse Generator A is triggered and a sync pulse is fed to Generator B for delay of simulated return pulse. In the radar system the delay between the transmit pulse and receive echo is primarily a function of range. In the ideal case, this range can be programmed into pulse Generator B. As discussed earlier, there is now a delay to be considered between the trigger out from Generator A and the input into Generator B, due to the propagation delay along the interconnecting cable. In the case described earlier, this will introduce an additional delay of 10ns. On a medium to long range radar, this extra delay would only introduce, at the most, a 0.1% error. However, for radars requiring tens of nanosecond delays, the cable delay introduces a 100% error.

Accurate timing measurements of these pulses is also a problem as cable lengths to inputs A and B on a timer/counter must be matched.

All the above errors can be removed through calibration and software correction, however, this creates more software overhead and increases the test time.

Figure 3a

Figure 3b-Radar Pulse Simulation


The Solution
An environment that allows the critical pulse generation and measurement instruments to sit far closer together is bound to reduce the time delay problems. Instruments on a card and the VXIbus concept take care of this problem in more than one way.

The VXI chassis allows for twelve instruments, plus a Slot 0 controller, to have inter-module spacing of only 1.2 inches. Pulse generators and counter/timers arranged in adjacent slots can now realize transmission time delays of <0.25ns. Even when mounting two pulse generators at extremes of the cage and placing the counter equidistance from both, the worst delay would be 2ns.


Conclusion
The emergence of VXI and instruments on a card, with increased performance to the older rack-and-stack instruments, means that high performance systems can now be developed easily.

With this increased performance comes the added bonus of reduced size test sets. Figure 4 depicts an example of a VXIbus version of the ATE system in Figure 1.

Figure 4 - VXI Test System

VXI-1
Counter-Timer: 1 slot
DVM: 1 slot
Function Generator: 1 slot
Programmable Digitizer: 2 slots
Calibration Standard: 6 slots

VXI-2
Pulse Generator: 1 slot
Pulse Delay Generator: 1 slot
Display Stimulus Generator : 2 slots
Ratio Transformer: 2 slots
Custom Switching: 2 slots
ICA Panel

VXI-3
Synchro Resolver: 3 cards
Computer and I/O Controller


TOC
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13